Amazing conversations about media

Navigation menu

Lowest Prices Anywhere!
There is too much buffering. Archived from the original on 12 April Make-up Classes and Closings Make-up Policies: Spaces fill quickly, so we recommend calling in ahead of time to reserve your spot! Then, as now, these discussions often concerned the nature of man, the existence of a soul, when life begins, and the beginning of human personhood. Powerful Watt Motor German made watt motor drives the transmission creating a high speed drive to blend and process and a lower speed drive to mix, cream, and knead.

Recipe Spotlight

Abortion debate

Universal Animal Cuts - 42 Packs. Universal Animal Energy - 60 Cap. Universal Animal Flex - 44 Pack. Universal Animal Fury Lemonade - 30 Servings. Universal Animal Fury Orange - 30 Servings. Universal Animal Fury Watermelon - 20 Servings.

Universal Animal Fury Watermelon - 30 Servings. Universal Animal M Stak - 21 Pack. Universal Animal Mass Chocolate - 5. Universal Animal Mass Vanilla - 5. Please email me when back in stock. Universal Animal Nitro - 44 Pack. Universal Animal Omega - 30 pack. Universal Animal Paks - 15 Pack. Universal Animal Paks - 44 Pack. Universal Animal PM - 30 Packs. Universal Animal Pump - 30 Pack.

Universal Animal Shaker Bottle Black. Universal Animal Stak - 21 Pack. Universal Animal Test - 21 Pack. Universal Animal Whey Banana - 4 Lb. Universal Animal Whey Chocolate - 10 Lb. Universal Animal Whey Chocolate - 2 Lb. Universal Animal Whey Chocolate - 4 Lb. Universal Animal Whey Vanilla - 10 Lb.

Universal Animal Whey Vanilla - 2 Lb. Universal Animal Whey Vanilla - 4 Lb. Universal Collagen Unflavored - 60 Servings. Universal Creatine Chews Grape - Chews. Universal Creatine Chews Orange - Chew. Universal Creatine Monohydrate - Grams. Their efforts as can be seen from his last assinine statement, is to keep at all cost the issue of "when does life begin off the arguing table.

It is obvious to us why, "they ain't got a leg to stand on," that's why!! His lack of biological data is even more.

He is answered on his argument of "personhood" by a real Doctor who knows his stuff. Speaking of personhood of the unborn, he states,. It is based on the discovery that the unborn child is a feeling, remembering, aware being, and because he is, what happens to him This realization and the remarkable body of research it springs from take us well beyond what we know-or think we know- about the emotional development of the unborn child.

And while, scientif ically, that is enormously exciting among other things, it forever displaces the old Freudian notion that personality does not begin forming until the second or third year.

All of these together shows me one clear message: The pro-abortionist is not concerned with facts at all, he is just concerned with his or her own hedonistic desires, even to the point of MURDER.

Their arguments are mute, because they don't care if they are killing another human being. And as we will see in the next chapter on Morals, the reason of saving the mother's life is so rare, as to not even constitute an argument.

So what do you do with the doctor who aborts a baby? Simple, charge him with murder!! What about the woman? She is either an accessory to murder or guilty of involuntary manslaughter, depending on her knowledge of what she was doing. In court, if she can be shown to know the baby is alive and that the abortion was intended to kill it, then she is guilty of murder, too.

Those are the facts. Too bad if someone doesn't like it, they can just lump it. As with many of the murder cases today, the camera is always on the "poor criminal," what about the tortured and dismembered VICTIM? Now for the next chapter on Morals, this is the "situation ethnics" chapter for the pro-abortionist, this is their favorite stomping ground.

Having seen that the Bible condemns abortion, modern medicine and science make it clear that the unborn baby is alive, they have no recourse but to make up horror stories of rape, retardation, incest, and a host of other "problems" to justify. Morality apart from the Bible is really a misnomer. As is seen by studying philosophy, there is no real reason for morality of any sort without there being a God and being accountable to Him. So any attempt at speaking about the morality or immorality of abortion is vain, apart from the Bible.

As will be seen so many times in this chapter, the pro-abortionist or at least the man or woman who claims neutrality on the abortion issue, will claim that the mothers RIGHTS are violated by making the poor darling go through with an "unwanted" pregnancy. This is their focal point, the desires of the mother. Hedonism is so rampant today that, as the Bible correctly states, they are "without natural affection We have lived to see the day that so-called Christian leaders and godly "Christians" are saying that abortion murder is justifiable and no more than an appendectomy.

Abe Lincoln once asked a man, "How many legs would a sheep have if you called his tail a leg? Such a conclusion is drawn from faith in the evolutionary process, as well as a decidedly antagonistic view toward the Biblical concept of life.

He quotes another new version of the Declaration of Independence,. That all men are created equal in the third trimester.

That they are endowed by the evolutionary process with certain inalienable rights depending on their viability as a human being. That among these are the right to death so long as it occurs before the deadline; liberty, if the mother and physician agree; and the pursuit of happiness should they not be one of the 'Victims of Abortion - The American Holocaust. So in this the third chapter, dealing with the moral issues surrounding abortion",we will not revert, as the proabortionist does, to semantic arguments, about the "viability of the fetus" or the "personhood of the embryo," but will use Bible terms such as "child" or "babe" or derivatives of those.

Someone wants them, as is evident from the seven-year waiting lists at most adoption agencies. You say, "'What about the crippled or retarded? We'll get to those, but right now we will be dealing with the largest group, by far, of the aborted babies, therapeutic abortions. Which translates into, "I just don't want to be pregnant right now. Now who is kidding whom? The 'argument is really preposterous. Some of these planned children who are so egotistical that they actually think they can control their own environment.

When the baby comes, they f ind out how wrong they really are. The baby is not always logical or reasonable!! They're unwanted because of their poor condition is really absurd, especially in America, the socialist state! And are you really thinking of the little darling? If so, why kill him? A child in the womb is not conscious of being poor or unwanted. Hundreds of thousands of children living outside the womb are feeling the effects of these conditions every day.

Surely, the reasonable course of action would be to begin with actual suffering instead of potential suffering. Of course, it is true that these suffering children have lived outside the womb for a while, but what possible difference could a few months make if the true tragedy is to be poor or unwanted? It should make no difference to those whose reasoning is on the brink of insanity.

Pro-abortionist Martha Willing states the opposing view,. In South Korea, which has always accepted infanticide, abortion and sale of children, American aid attempts to forbid these natural responses to poverty Have you done that when the electric bill is too high?? I can speak with somewhat of an authoritarian view concerning her statement on Korea. I lived there for about one year I'll bet that's longer than her, and I did see the sale of babies, the deforming of children by their own parents in order to make them better beggars.

I've seen young girls sold to Momma Sans to be brought up to be her prostitutes. So what does that have to do with killing babies? If they do it, that means we can too?

Is that what you're getting at, woman I would say lady but can't get myself to insult the few real ladies there are left in this country?

We refuse to decide whom to let die quietly and whom to prevent from being born. Now there is a good piece of lunacy!! We are playing God by trying to save lives but she is not by killing them?? Yeah, woman, sure, we believe you!! Your preventing people from being born is not like us "old Bible totin' Funnymentalists," is it? If you noticed in her statements she is not averse to infanticide or euthanasia, which means you old geezers better look out! This woman is not alone in her stupidy; in Denmark in under the Pregnancy Act,.

Of the latter indication, Skalts and Norgaard say that " it is a social indication, it being the interests of the child, not the woman herself, that are safeguarded: Now, there you have it, "kiddo" we are killing you for your own good, your mom can't buy you everything you want and you won't have Van Hausen or Jordache shirts to wear so you'd be better off DEADII If you think I have strained the point then you haven't read much.

The mentality, or should I say, lack of mentality of these yoyo's is the norm and not the exception. After all, if there is no God, according to most of them, and you are just a product of evolution, then what's all the fuss about? If you're just an animal anyway, then let's do whatever makes us feel good!! If that wasn't enough, here we go again, in Hungary in a law The committee, however, can function only as a rubber stamp, for it must approve the abortion, 'if the applicant insists.

Let's have a committee to make sure we don't kill any babies, huh?? America isn't the only knot-head country around, is it? Next we will look at the terrible menace to society, the oh heaven!! Surely now, if the kid is not going to be perfectly normal, let's say with at least an IQ of then he would be better off dead, wouldn't YOU!!?

We quote again from someone who works in this field,. That was from a Psychiatrist, now let's see what a mother of Down's Syndrome child has to say,.

Delahoyde devotes herself to fighting against infant euthanasia and abortion. She explains her belief that in modern society, everything is geared toward perfection. Some think that death might be the best option for some handicapped children because they think real people are 'normal' people. The crux of the matter is as the woman earlier put it, "they are trying to play God.

These few exceptions are brought to the fore by the pro abortionist to agitate the feelings of the general public into agreeing with them to let several million normal babies be murdered at the whim of for the most part - fornicating whores. The same ones who are advocating the murder of infants on the ground that they are unwanted and will be a drain on society, are against executing convicted murderers and rapists who cost the American taxpayer millions of dollars a year to house and entertain them.

Roloff said, "America is an insane asylum run by the inmates. The next "pig in the poke,' is the incidence of rape and resultant pregnancy.

This is used as a good scare tactic, it goes something like this, "Yeah, you say your against abortion, but wait till your wife or little girl gets raped and gets pregnant, then we'll see how you feel? Even in the unlikely event that someone does rape your wife or girl, and in the even unlikelier event that they become pregnant, why do you think killing an unborn baby will cure everything? Yes, rape is a terrible thing, a lot of people go through terrible things every day, unfair things.

But as I said before, what has that got to do with murdering an unborn child? If it is established that the unborn is a human being, and it has, Biblically and Biologically, then why kill an innocent third party?

But let's read a few facts, shall we? There are several contributing factors to this. In addition to the pure mathematical odds against pregnancy resulting f rom a single random act, medical research indicates that an extremely high percentage of woman exposed to severe emotional trauma will not ovulate. The rape itself, therefore acts as a psychological 'birth control. And add to this the statistics of births due to rape, and you will find that statutory rape is usually included.

Statutory rape is usually not forcible rape. Any girl seventeen or younger who has had intercourse can be classified as having been raped. The idea being, she was too young to give legitimate consent. A study done by J.

Kuchera for the Journal of the American Medical Association states,. There you have it, like a dead dog in your front yard, facts are facts. Rape is not an issue, nor should it be an issue of much importance when discussing the abortion question. Let's go on to some of the other arguments from hysteria. We will be quoting from Dr. Bernard Nathanson, whom we've already quoted from. He is an atheist and a Jew. He had performed or had performed under his supervision at least 75, abortions.

He is now a pro-life Advocate. He covers several topics in this particular quote, it will be left in tact so that the reader can get a clearer perspective of what he is saying, we now quote from Dr.

Concerning the "woman and her doctor theory"-the view that they alone should decide on abortion. He quotes another author who says,. He speaks of the "unwanted child" syndrome,. Child abuse has risen noticeably since abortion was legalized, and so have illegitimate births, despite the availability of abortion as an alternative If a fetus is carried to term it will be "unwanted" only for the nine months between conception and birth.

It need never be 'unwanted' because of the hopeless shortage of babies available for the long list of childless couples who earnestly want to adopt them.

Of the "coat hanger" argument. He admits that back-alley abortion was one of his early motivations in the pro-abortion cause. I confess I knew the figures were totally false, and I suppose the others did too if they stopped to think of it. But in the 'morality' of our revolution, it was a useful figure, widely accepted, so why go out of our way to correct it with honest statistics? In before abortion was legalized, the federal government listed only deaths from illegal abortion.

In , the last year before the U. Supreme decision opened the abortion door, there was a total of 39 deaths f rom illegal abortions. Certainly, even 39 women are important among the tens of millions in America. But it is absolute insanity even for the guardians of our "human resources"-to shout for the lives of 39 women in and say nothing of the lives of 1,, babies murdered in There are more than that who die from "legal" abortions now!

Nathanson speaks to the issue of "cost benefit. This may be good politics but it is hardly exemplar social morality. It reeks of the Pentagon's 'body count' thinking of the Viet Nam era.

Certain human issues are too grave to be handled in this way and must be shielded from a cost-effectiveness theory. Abortion is one of them. Those are the views of Dr. He ought to know what he is talking about, shouldn't he? Another argument for killings kids is that it represents the "Womans Right to Choose.

Some women want their own way so much that they will kill to get it. This, again, is an argument from the brink of insanity. If the true cause is the glory of womanhood, why is it selective women's rights instead of protecting all women equally? Since the Supreme Court abortion decision of , an average of 80, women in each of the 50 states will never have the right to choose anything.

That many female babies have been murdered in their mothers, wombs. Eighty thousand militant feminists in each state in the Union could rock the political world on any subject. However, the truth of the matter is that if all those little ladies could be brought back to life, they would not support abortion as representing a woman's right to choose.

Another argument given is that a majority of Americans favor abortion. But even if it is true, so what?? Do we hinge our right to live on the vote of the America public?? No right is more basic. No right is more obvious. Only someone on the brink of insanity would want his right to live put to a vote of the majority.

Another argument is the "Population Explosion Myth. While there is little doubt that many people in India do suffer from a lack of food, this is not necessarily because of the number of people inhabiting that vast land. India had less people per square mile than England, West Germany or Taiwan There is actually not a 'population problem' as such today, as all the people of the world could fit side-by-side into Greater Jacksonville, Florida.

What we do have is a problem of food distribution and the availability of natural resources. What this dramatic decline in the fertility rate means is that in the not too distant future, there will be a disproportionate number of elderly compared to the number of youth.

Because this will place a tremendous economic burden upon the non-elderly to care for our older citizens, there will be a growing advocacy for euthanasia. The next argument is the call to "Save the Mother! The logic or illogic of the baby killers goes something like this,. Why is the mother more important? If God determines destiny and He chooses to have the child live and the mother die, who are you to intervene?

The argument is one of sarcasm. The real way it is put is, "Surely you Bible-toters accept abortion when the woman's life is in danger. Note the way they put it, in danger. We quote again from someone who deals with this on a regular basis.

From to , there were , deliveries at his maternity hospital with no abortions. All of these physicians work daily with delivery of babies, they have "hands on" experience.

They know more of what they are talking about than a bunch of quacks who make a living off of killing babies!

The "Save the Mother" syndrome has been used by pro-abortionist as a tool to generate sentiment in favor of lax abortion laws. There may be a one in a million case, in which case the thing to do is to try and save both. If it is impossible, then do all you can to save the mother Why?

As I said before, if the mother dies, they both die!! Another nonsensical platitude given by the baby killers is that it reduces diseases The little darling might be prone to cancer, heart disease, or some other diseases So let's rub him out! These types of arguments border on complete stupidity. If we aborted every baby that "might" come up with a disease, who would be left? Hymie Gorden, Chairman of the Dept.

Seriously affected persons are unlikely to marry and have children; the genes are passed along by carriers. For instance, there are 40 carriers for every person with sickle cell anemia Because each 'normal'person is the carrier of three of four bad genes, the only way to eliminate genetic diseases would be to sterilize or abort everybody.

It is absurd to see what extent these hedonists will go to get what they want. It is reminiscent of dealing with politicians. If they can't dazzle you with wit, they baffle you with bull. Let's continue with more of the latter from the looney bin. They say it is just a good method of birth control.

Why, no fake Jake? Ain't you the brilliant one? If you kill people off, you'll have less people! Now, there are many reasons given for controlling the population: That to me, as a physician and a person, is barbaric.

The major tragedy is that it is the affluent and middle class people who are looking to abortion as a birth control method. This is enlightening, is it not? Those "poor ole black folk" shouldn't have to raise all them kids, So let's kill em off! But, the truth is, it is the ones who CAN afford the kids who are having these kids killed just to keep from having them. To underscore it even further, Dr. Usually, reasons given include preserving the life of the mother, the expectation of a defective child, rape, and incest.

Then what is the real reason for abortion? That was in , you can imagine what it is now. An investigation by the Chicago Tribune in These people, in countless instances, were performing abortions on women who were not pregnant.

This, of course, is not an example of 'murder for prof it, but the profit motive is much in evidence. Now isn't that a new leaf to turn over. What they did was to give the young girl a pregnancy test, then tell them it is positive when it wasn't, then give them a fake "abortion" and charge them a bundle of dough!! Barnum was right, "A sucker born every minute," they seem to be coming every second or so now days.

Unborn children have inherited property, qualified for social security payments, and won damages after dying in the womb by means of suites filed in their behalf "Abortion, the Practice of Medicine, and the Due Process of Law," UCLA Law Review , Here's a good example of morality if you ever saw it. This forerunner of Hilter's eugenics movement also proclaimed that the most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.

Today, Planned Parenthood does not use such forceful language, but rather more subtle terms, like advocating the need for "genetic counseling.

Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact: That is what a mess of your and my tax money is going for right now. The Planned Parenthood Federation gets grants and subsidies from the government to carry out these and other programs. Such as the school based health. I will close this chapter by quoting a well known lecturer in medical schools.

He "asked one of his classes what they would recommend in the following case: Abortion is murder, pure and simple to all but the amoral. To all who have honestly looked at the facts, there is but one Biblical, Biological or Moral conclusion, and that is abortion is murder. The logic is simple, if it is not human, what have you done?

If it is a human being and you abort him, what have you done? We have seen Biblically that abortion is murder.

The verse used by many in Exodus This is interesting because of the garbage being spewed out about the Greek and the Hebrew being superior to the English. Such terms as "pneuma" and "ruach" are not to be considered when speaking intelligent Bible believers.